header-logo header-logo

Litigation? Don’t bank on it

13 May 2016 / Stephen Critchley
Issue: 7698 / Categories: Features , Banking
printer mail-detail
nlj_7698_critchley

Stephen Critchley considers which alleged competition law abuses by the banks are likely to lead to damages actions & which aren’t

In recent years, the world’s leading banks have been accused of breaching the antitrust laws of the US, Europe and other jurisdictions.

Results have varied. In Europe, for instance:

  • the Commission found the banks infringed Art 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union by manipulating the Euribor and Yen Libor interest rate benchmarks; and
  • its investigation into foreign exchange trading (FX) is ongoing; whereas
  • other alleged benchmark manipulations, eg of ISDAfix and non-Yen Libor, have appeared to excite less interest from the Commission; and
  • it closed its investigation into credit default swaps (CDSs) without finding infringement.

On 1 October 2015, Sch 8 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 came into force introducing a raft of measures to facilitate damages actions by victims of anticompetitive behaviour.

A key reform was the introduction of an “opt out” collective proceedings regime in the Completion Appeal Tribunal (the CAT). The regime

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll