header-logo header-logo

26 May 2023 / Maurice MacSweeney
Issue: 8026 / Categories: Features , Profession , Litigation funding , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Litigation funders: the key to unlocking growth?

123321
Maurice MacSweeney explains how funders are evolving beyond single-case litigation
  • Litigation funding is evolving from the financing of litigation into the funding of law firms more generally.

Litigation finance as a concept is not new—indeed, regulation of it first arose in medieval England. But its use as a tool to support those involved in commercial litigation and arbitration is much more recent, having entered the mainstream in many of the world’s major legal centres in the past two decades. While litigation funding has traditionally been offered to support large single cases, the market has seen an evolution into other areas, such as a portfolio of cases, more use of funding by corporates, and realising immediate value from litigation or arbitration which may still have some time to run.

However, the most recent development is perhaps the most revolutionary—litigation financiers becoming funders to law firms or other legal businesses, and for purposes not necessarily linked to litigation. With litigation funders’ knowledge of the legal market and a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll