header-logo header-logo

28 January 2021 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7918 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Litigation joy & Christmas in January

37590
Dominic Regan believes the consultation on GHR and clarity on the workings of DBAs will bring due comfort and joy to the civil litigation community

By 15 January this year two long awaited developments had occurred. A consultation on guideline hourly rates, last revised a decade ago, was published and then a week later the Court of Appeal handed down judgment about the workings of damages based agreements in Zuberi v Lexlaw (2021) EWCA Civ 16. Both of these events have generated joy within the civil litigation community.

Lord Justice Jackson, in his seminal report, recommended that solicitors be permitted to act in proceedings in return for a percentage of damages recovered. This model of financing claims was already well established in employment tribunal proceedings. This author advised the government on the relevant regulations.

Bemusement

Unfortunately, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), to the bemusement of Sir Rupert, failed to adhere to his detailed recommendations. The resulting regulations were a mess. In particular, the strangulated language seemed to ban

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll