header-logo header-logo

28 January 2021 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7918 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Litigation joy & Christmas in January

37590
Dominic Regan believes the consultation on GHR and clarity on the workings of DBAs will bring due comfort and joy to the civil litigation community

By 15 January this year two long awaited developments had occurred. A consultation on guideline hourly rates, last revised a decade ago, was published and then a week later the Court of Appeal handed down judgment about the workings of damages based agreements in Zuberi v Lexlaw (2021) EWCA Civ 16. Both of these events have generated joy within the civil litigation community.

Lord Justice Jackson, in his seminal report, recommended that solicitors be permitted to act in proceedings in return for a percentage of damages recovered. This model of financing claims was already well established in employment tribunal proceedings. This author advised the government on the relevant regulations.

Bemusement

Unfortunately, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), to the bemusement of Sir Rupert, failed to adhere to his detailed recommendations. The resulting regulations were a mess. In particular, the strangulated language seemed to ban

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll