header-logo header-logo

16 December 2016 / Dr Pippa Rogerson
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Litigation post-Brexit

After Brexit: is international commercial litigation in London doomed? Pippa Rogerson examines the evidence

  • Unfounded predictions of decline of the Commercial Court.
  • Common law rules on jurisdiction and enforcement should be extended to cover all cases and Brussels I Regulation Recast should not be replicated in English law.
  • Hague Conference must be joined and the Convention on Choice of Court Agreements ratified.
  • Rome I Regulation on choice of law should be replicated in English law.

Post-Brexit will English jurisdiction agreements and English choice of law clauses be less effective? Continental commentators have suggested the demise of the English commercial court as international commercial litigation will move to Europe. In the short term, the UK government has to decide whether to replicate the existing private international law instruments in English law. In the longer run, it will have to decide whether to negotiate with the EU for common rules on the jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments.

I do not believe many of the concerns are well founded. True, the UK will become a third

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll