header-logo header-logo

16 December 2016 / Dr Pippa Rogerson
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Litigation post-Brexit

After Brexit: is international commercial litigation in London doomed? Pippa Rogerson examines the evidence

  • Unfounded predictions of decline of the Commercial Court.
  • Common law rules on jurisdiction and enforcement should be extended to cover all cases and Brussels I Regulation Recast should not be replicated in English law.
  • Hague Conference must be joined and the Convention on Choice of Court Agreements ratified.
  • Rome I Regulation on choice of law should be replicated in English law.

Post-Brexit will English jurisdiction agreements and English choice of law clauses be less effective? Continental commentators have suggested the demise of the English commercial court as international commercial litigation will move to Europe. In the short term, the UK government has to decide whether to replicate the existing private international law instruments in English law. In the longer run, it will have to decide whether to negotiate with the EU for common rules on the jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments.

I do not believe many of the concerns are well founded. True, the UK will become a third

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll