header-logo header-logo

LNB news: HMCTS on lessons learned from conducting multi-handed cases within social distancing restrictions

14 September 2021
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has published an article detailing how it managed a complex murder trial involving eight defendants, four of which were held in a maximum-security prison, under coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic conditions. The article explains how the use of technology enabled the Preston Crown Court trial to take place
Lexis®Library update: HMCTS has said that the trial, which involved the death of a teenage student who was mistakenly killed in a drive-by shooting in Blackburn in spring 2020, may have required the use of the entire court building for the 10 -week duration of the trial had it been necessary for all the defendants to appear in person.

According to HMCTS, this is due to the legal requirement that maximum security prisoners be supervised by a team of specialist prison officers in addition to COVID-19 social distancing requirements.

HMCTS explained that this problem was circumvented using the Cloud Video Platform (CVP) system to establish a video link to various individuals involved. Prisoners attended court via the remote hearing system from their prisons unless they were giving evidence, in which case they would appear in person. Police officers, journalists and relatives of involved parties were also able to attend remotely, thereby further reducing the number of persons in court.

The judge presiding over the case, Mr Justice Turner, has said: ‘The careful deployment of CVP links to the prisons and the exercise of care in limiting physical court appearances to what was reasonably practicable was a challenging exercise in choreography but one which was achieved as a result of commendable co-ordination involving all stakeholders. I am also entirely satisfied that the vital requirement of access to justice was preserved throughout. I have nothing but praise for all those involved in bringing this ship home to port.’

HMCTS has said that the management of this case greatly reduced the potential backlog which would have been caused by the entirety of Preston Crown Court being dedicated to a single case over a period of 10 weeks.

Source: HMCTS on lessons learned from conducting multi-handed cases within social distancing restrictions

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll