header-logo header-logo

LNB news: HMCTS on lessons learned from conducting multi-handed cases within social distancing restrictions

14 September 2021
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has published an article detailing how it managed a complex murder trial involving eight defendants, four of which were held in a maximum-security prison, under coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic conditions. The article explains how the use of technology enabled the Preston Crown Court trial to take place
Lexis®Library update: HMCTS has said that the trial, which involved the death of a teenage student who was mistakenly killed in a drive-by shooting in Blackburn in spring 2020, may have required the use of the entire court building for the 10 -week duration of the trial had it been necessary for all the defendants to appear in person.

According to HMCTS, this is due to the legal requirement that maximum security prisoners be supervised by a team of specialist prison officers in addition to COVID-19 social distancing requirements.

HMCTS explained that this problem was circumvented using the Cloud Video Platform (CVP) system to establish a video link to various individuals involved. Prisoners attended court via the remote hearing system from their prisons unless they were giving evidence, in which case they would appear in person. Police officers, journalists and relatives of involved parties were also able to attend remotely, thereby further reducing the number of persons in court.

The judge presiding over the case, Mr Justice Turner, has said: ‘The careful deployment of CVP links to the prisons and the exercise of care in limiting physical court appearances to what was reasonably practicable was a challenging exercise in choreography but one which was achieved as a result of commendable co-ordination involving all stakeholders. I am also entirely satisfied that the vital requirement of access to justice was preserved throughout. I have nothing but praise for all those involved in bringing this ship home to port.’

HMCTS has said that the management of this case greatly reduced the potential backlog which would have been caused by the entirety of Preston Crown Court being dedicated to a single case over a period of 10 weeks.

Source: HMCTS on lessons learned from conducting multi-handed cases within social distancing restrictions

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll