header-logo header-logo

14 September 2021
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

LNB news: HMCTS on lessons learned from conducting multi-handed cases within social distancing restrictions

HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has published an article detailing how it managed a complex murder trial involving eight defendants, four of which were held in a maximum-security prison, under coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic conditions. The article explains how the use of technology enabled the Preston Crown Court trial to take place
Lexis®Library update: HMCTS has said that the trial, which involved the death of a teenage student who was mistakenly killed in a drive-by shooting in Blackburn in spring 2020, may have required the use of the entire court building for the 10 -week duration of the trial had it been necessary for all the defendants to appear in person.

According to HMCTS, this is due to the legal requirement that maximum security prisoners be supervised by a team of specialist prison officers in addition to COVID-19 social distancing requirements.

HMCTS explained that this problem was circumvented using the Cloud Video Platform (CVP) system to establish a video link to various individuals involved. Prisoners attended court via the remote hearing system from their prisons unless they were giving evidence, in which case they would appear in person. Police officers, journalists and relatives of involved parties were also able to attend remotely, thereby further reducing the number of persons in court.

The judge presiding over the case, Mr Justice Turner, has said: ‘The careful deployment of CVP links to the prisons and the exercise of care in limiting physical court appearances to what was reasonably practicable was a challenging exercise in choreography but one which was achieved as a result of commendable co-ordination involving all stakeholders. I am also entirely satisfied that the vital requirement of access to justice was preserved throughout. I have nothing but praise for all those involved in bringing this ship home to port.’

HMCTS has said that the management of this case greatly reduced the potential backlog which would have been caused by the entirety of Preston Crown Court being dedicated to a single case over a period of 10 weeks.

Source: HMCTS on lessons learned from conducting multi-handed cases within social distancing restrictions

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll