header-logo header-logo

15 March 2012
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Local authorities

R (on the application of NM) v Islington London Borough Council [2012] EWHC 414 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 35 (Mar)

Parliament could not have intended to create an obligation of assessment in relation to a very wide class of cases of future provision of services, since doing so would create a serious risk of scarce resources available to local authorities for community care being wasted through assessments being carried out for no ultimate good purpose.

In interpreting the intended ambit of the class of cases of future provision covered by s 47(1) of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990, it was necessary to bear in mind that the relevant condition set out in the opening part of the provision was expressed in the present tense, so it was reasonable to suppose that Parliament intended the relevant extension to cover future cases on pragmatic grounds to be narrow. The future cases intended to be covered were those which were closely analogous to those where there was a (possible) present need for provision of community

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
back-to-top-scroll