header-logo header-logo

Locating the smoking gun

09 June 2011 / Greg Wildisen
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Bribery
printer mail-detail

Organisations need to adapt their business processes to avoid breaching the Bribery Act, says Greg Wildisen

The Bribery Act 2010 will come into force on 1 July 2011. It is set to alter business practices for UK companies and individuals conducting business in the UK or overseas, and foreign companies with a presence in the UK. The Act introduces a general offence prohibiting active and passive bribery, a specific offence of bribing a foreign public official, and a corporate offence for commercial organisations for failing to prevent active bribery committed by their employees, agents or subsidiaries (the corporate offence).

Corporate offence defence

Pursuant to s 7(2) of the Act, it will be a defence to a corporate breach if an organisation can demonstrate that it has “adequate procedures” in place, designed to prevent persons associated with it from committing bribery. In accordance with s 9 of the Act, the Ministry of Justice has issued guidance upon what will constitute “adequate procedures” (30 March 2011). The Secretary of State summarises that: “The guidance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll