header-logo header-logo

09 June 2011 / Greg Wildisen
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Bribery
printer mail-detail

Locating the smoking gun

Organisations need to adapt their business processes to avoid breaching the Bribery Act, says Greg Wildisen

The Bribery Act 2010 will come into force on 1 July 2011. It is set to alter business practices for UK companies and individuals conducting business in the UK or overseas, and foreign companies with a presence in the UK. The Act introduces a general offence prohibiting active and passive bribery, a specific offence of bribing a foreign public official, and a corporate offence for commercial organisations for failing to prevent active bribery committed by their employees, agents or subsidiaries (the corporate offence).

Corporate offence defence

Pursuant to s 7(2) of the Act, it will be a defence to a corporate breach if an organisation can demonstrate that it has “adequate procedures” in place, designed to prevent persons associated with it from committing bribery. In accordance with s 9 of the Act, the Ministry of Justice has issued guidance upon what will constitute “adequate procedures” (30 March 2011). The Secretary of State summarises that: “The guidance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll