header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
21 September 2012 / Victoria Beel , Richard Scorer
Issue: 7530 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Locked out of life

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Who should have the right to a medically assisted death? Richard Scorer & Victoria Beel report

Following a stroke in 2005, Tony Nicklinson suffered from locked in syndrome; he was paralysed below the neck and unable to speak.

In a statement to the court he said ‘I am fed up with my life and don’t want to spend the next 20 years or so like this……I have no privacy or dignity left’.  Mr Nicklinson wanted to die, but as a result of his disability was unable to take his own life. He was also unable to turn to family or doctors as assisting someone to die remains an offence under s. 2 (1) Suicide Act 1961 (as amended).

If the assistance given extends to performing the act which brings about death (voluntary active euthanasia), as would have been required in Mr Nicklinson’s case, the person providing the assistance may be charged with manslaughter or murder.
 

Mr Nicklinson’s case is one of several which have highlighted the issue of assisted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll