header-logo header-logo

21 September 2012 / Victoria Beel , Richard Scorer
Issue: 7530 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Locked out of life

Who should have the right to a medically assisted death? Richard Scorer & Victoria Beel report

Following a stroke in 2005, Tony Nicklinson suffered from locked in syndrome; he was paralysed below the neck and unable to speak.

In a statement to the court he said ‘I am fed up with my life and don’t want to spend the next 20 years or so like this……I have no privacy or dignity left’.  Mr Nicklinson wanted to die, but as a result of his disability was unable to take his own life. He was also unable to turn to family or doctors as assisting someone to die remains an offence under s. 2 (1) Suicide Act 1961 (as amended).

If the assistance given extends to performing the act which brings about death (voluntary active euthanasia), as would have been required in Mr Nicklinson’s case, the person providing the assistance may be charged with manslaughter or murder.
 

Mr Nicklinson’s case is one of several which have highlighted the issue of assisted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll