header-logo header-logo

23 April 2009 / Graham Reid
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The long arm of the regulator

Graham Reid on the SRA's new powers
 
 

Since 31 March 2009, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has new powers to regulate firms of solicitors.

It will no longer be looking solely at individual responsibility for acts and omissions: it is also going after organisational under-performance and misconduct.

This new approach is reflected in changes to the Solicitors' Code of Conduct (the code). So, when the regulator says “you” must do something, in most cases this now means both solicitors and recognised bodies (the new label for what most people would still call “a solicitors' firm”).

These changes are backed up by enforcement powers. For minor infractions the SRA will be able to fine firms up to £2,000 and apply conditions to their authorisation. For the more serious cases the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) has the power to levy unlimited fines on all types of firms, their managers and employees.

Inevitable

Firm-based regulation is a sensible and inevitable development. For one thing, it corrects an anomaly under the old code

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll