header-logo header-logo

23 April 2009 / Graham Reid
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The long arm of the regulator

Graham Reid on the SRA's new powers
 
 

Since 31 March 2009, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has new powers to regulate firms of solicitors.

It will no longer be looking solely at individual responsibility for acts and omissions: it is also going after organisational under-performance and misconduct.

This new approach is reflected in changes to the Solicitors' Code of Conduct (the code). So, when the regulator says “you” must do something, in most cases this now means both solicitors and recognised bodies (the new label for what most people would still call “a solicitors' firm”).

These changes are backed up by enforcement powers. For minor infractions the SRA will be able to fine firms up to £2,000 and apply conditions to their authorisation. For the more serious cases the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) has the power to levy unlimited fines on all types of firms, their managers and employees.

Inevitable

Firm-based regulation is a sensible and inevitable development. For one thing, it corrects an anomaly under the old code

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll