header-logo header-logo

Long days at court?

15 July 2020
Issue: 7895 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail
Two-thirds of barristers would find extended court operating hours ‘an impossibility’ due to caring responsibilities or because they are themselves vulnerable during the pandemic, the Bar Council has warned

In a message to members this week, Bar Council chair Amanda Pinto QC (pictured) highlighted not-yet-published Bar Council research from its latest survey that ‘one third of the Bar has been shielding, self-isolating, vulnerable, caring for those self-isolating or vulnerable and a further third are the primary carer for children.’

Pinto said the Bar Council did not support extended hours and could not do so without ‘reliable evidence’ that it would be effective. She suggested maximising use of the court estate, better listing of cases and using more part-time judges instead.

Ministers’ proposals for a longer court day have fallen on stony ground at the Bar. Criminal Bar Association chair Caroline Goodwin QC said meetings take place before and after court, barristers often travel two hours to court and have extra work and costs on top.

Issue: 7895 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll