header-logo header-logo

Long days at court?

15 July 2020
Issue: 7895 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail
Two-thirds of barristers would find extended court operating hours ‘an impossibility’ due to caring responsibilities or because they are themselves vulnerable during the pandemic, the Bar Council has warned

In a message to members this week, Bar Council chair Amanda Pinto QC (pictured) highlighted not-yet-published Bar Council research from its latest survey that ‘one third of the Bar has been shielding, self-isolating, vulnerable, caring for those self-isolating or vulnerable and a further third are the primary carer for children.’

Pinto said the Bar Council did not support extended hours and could not do so without ‘reliable evidence’ that it would be effective. She suggested maximising use of the court estate, better listing of cases and using more part-time judges instead.

Ministers’ proposals for a longer court day have fallen on stony ground at the Bar. Criminal Bar Association chair Caroline Goodwin QC said meetings take place before and after court, barristers often travel two hours to court and have extra work and costs on top.

Issue: 7895 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll