header-logo header-logo

13 October 2017 / Eleanor Moodey
Issue: 7765 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Family
printer mail-detail

The long farewell: leaving the EU (Pt 3)

In this Brexit update Eleanor Moodey addresses the practical issue of future dilemmas for international families

 

  • Interactions with the CJEU for international family law are, and will continue to be, extensive.

Ever since the announcement of the Brexit vote, and the triggering of Article 50 on 28 March 2017, lawyers and politicians have been debating what the impact will be for those areas of UK law currently created by and enmeshed with EU Treaties, Regulations and Directives. The implications for businesses and the economy have dominated both political and press coverage. Family lawyers were therefore hopeful that the publishing of the Government paper on cross-border judicial cooperation on 22 August 2017 would provide some clarification

The Government’s paper

The paper’s stated aim is for continued co-operation following Brexit between the UK and the remaining 27 EU member states.

Whilst the aim is laudable, and surely one with which everyone can agree, the fact is that, without alternative legal arrangements in place, the EU Regulations will cease

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll