header-logo header-logo

Look, no hands!

22 July 2016 / Lucy McCormick , Matthew Channon
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
nlj_7708_channon_mccormick

Matthew Channon & Lucy McCormick consider the challenges that driverless cars are posing for the insurance industry

  • May 2016 saw the UK announcement of the world’s first driverless car insurance legislation, as well as the launch of the first consumer driverless car policy.

  • However, the insurance of driverless cars remains a thorny issue, raising questions of how to set premiums and how to determine liability.

  • Over the next few years, the focus is likely to move from individual motor policies to manufacturers’ product liability cover. In the longer term, one possible solution would be the establishment of a central “no fault” compensation fund paid into through a premium on the purchase of driverless cars.

According to the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, 95% of all road accidents involve human error, and in 76% of road accidents the driver is solely to blame. Factors include tiredness, impatience and alcohol. While “driverless” cars are not infallible—as illustrated by February’s “Googlecar” collision and May’s fatal Tesla “Autopilot” crash—their introduction is likely to dramatically

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll