header-logo header-logo

22 July 2016 / Lucy McCormick , Matthew Channon
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Look, no hands!

nlj_7708_channon_mccormick

Matthew Channon & Lucy McCormick consider the challenges that driverless cars are posing for the insurance industry

  • May 2016 saw the UK announcement of the world’s first driverless car insurance legislation, as well as the launch of the first consumer driverless car policy.

  • However, the insurance of driverless cars remains a thorny issue, raising questions of how to set premiums and how to determine liability.

  • Over the next few years, the focus is likely to move from individual motor policies to manufacturers’ product liability cover. In the longer term, one possible solution would be the establishment of a central “no fault” compensation fund paid into through a premium on the purchase of driverless cars.

According to the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, 95% of all road accidents involve human error, and in 76% of road accidents the driver is solely to blame. Factors include tiredness, impatience and alcohol. While “driverless” cars are not infallible—as illustrated by February’s “Googlecar” collision and May’s fatal Tesla “Autopilot” crash—their introduction is likely to dramatically

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll