header-logo header-logo

14 August 2015
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Look, no service

In a low value road traffic accident case the claimant issues a limitation protective Pt 8 claim whilst the pre-action protocol stages are progressed. The claim form is returned to the claimant’s solicitors for service if required in due course but the court fails to stay the claim as sought in the claim form. The claimant’s solicitors are not alert to this fact and fail to serve within four months of issue. Can the claim be rescued?

CPR 7.6 applies and is a self-contained code. It provides that time can only be extended if the claimant has taken all reasonable steps to comply with CPR 7.5 but has been unable to do so or the has court failed to serve the claim form and in either event the claimant has acted promptly in making the application. That self-contained code operates outside of CPR 3.9, Mitchell, Denton etc. Here, there is no evidence to suggest that the claimant could make a successful application.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
Material obtained through US discovery applications may have a much longer legal life than many litigants realise
English courts are developing a distinctly practical approach to sanctions disputes arising from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
back-to-top-scroll