header-logo header-logo

Look, no service

14 August 2015
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

In a low value road traffic accident case the claimant issues a limitation protective Pt 8 claim whilst the pre-action protocol stages are progressed. The claim form is returned to the claimant’s solicitors for service if required in due course but the court fails to stay the claim as sought in the claim form. The claimant’s solicitors are not alert to this fact and fail to serve within four months of issue. Can the claim be rescued?

CPR 7.6 applies and is a self-contained code. It provides that time can only be extended if the claimant has taken all reasonable steps to comply with CPR 7.5 but has been unable to do so or the has court failed to serve the claim form and in either event the claimant has acted promptly in making the application. That self-contained code operates outside of CPR 3.9, Mitchell, Denton etc. Here, there is no evidence to suggest that the claimant could make a successful application.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll