header-logo header-logo

20 June 2014 / Dr Lisa Whitehouse , Susan Bright
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Losing a home

property_brightwhitehouse

Does the current housing possession process provide effective access to justice? Susan Bright & Lisa Whitehouse report

Every year, more than 220,000 claims are brought for possession, mostly for rent and mortgage arrears. To make the right decision, the judge needs to know not only about the defendant’s financial situation (how much arrears are owed and how much income the occupier has), but also whether eviction really is a “last resort” and what the occupier’s personal circumstances are.

We have recently completed a detailed study exploring how (and whether) this information is made known to judges during the possession process, and what kind of support is available to occupiers. Our findings show that although judges will usually have the facts and figures relating to the payment history available to them, they sometimes have only sketchy information available to them about the occupier’s circumstances more generally. Very few occupiers receive legal advice before the hearing, and it appears that many do not file a defence form or turn up at court to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll