header-logo header-logo

Losing a home

20 June 2014 / Dr Lisa Whitehouse , Susan Bright
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
property_brightwhitehouse

Does the current housing possession process provide effective access to justice? Susan Bright & Lisa Whitehouse report

Every year, more than 220,000 claims are brought for possession, mostly for rent and mortgage arrears. To make the right decision, the judge needs to know not only about the defendant’s financial situation (how much arrears are owed and how much income the occupier has), but also whether eviction really is a “last resort” and what the occupier’s personal circumstances are.

We have recently completed a detailed study exploring how (and whether) this information is made known to judges during the possession process, and what kind of support is available to occupiers. Our findings show that although judges will usually have the facts and figures relating to the payment history available to them, they sometimes have only sketchy information available to them about the occupier’s circumstances more generally. Very few occupiers receive legal advice before the hearing, and it appears that many do not file a defence form or turn up at court to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll