header-logo header-logo

Losing a home

20 June 2014 / Dr Lisa Whitehouse , Susan Bright
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
property_brightwhitehouse

Does the current housing possession process provide effective access to justice? Susan Bright & Lisa Whitehouse report

Every year, more than 220,000 claims are brought for possession, mostly for rent and mortgage arrears. To make the right decision, the judge needs to know not only about the defendant’s financial situation (how much arrears are owed and how much income the occupier has), but also whether eviction really is a “last resort” and what the occupier’s personal circumstances are.

We have recently completed a detailed study exploring how (and whether) this information is made known to judges during the possession process, and what kind of support is available to occupiers. Our findings show that although judges will usually have the facts and figures relating to the payment history available to them, they sometimes have only sketchy information available to them about the occupier’s circumstances more generally. Very few occupiers receive legal advice before the hearing, and it appears that many do not file a defence form or turn up at court to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll