header-logo header-logo

20 June 2014 / Dr Lisa Whitehouse , Susan Bright
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Losing a home

property_brightwhitehouse

Does the current housing possession process provide effective access to justice? Susan Bright & Lisa Whitehouse report

Every year, more than 220,000 claims are brought for possession, mostly for rent and mortgage arrears. To make the right decision, the judge needs to know not only about the defendant’s financial situation (how much arrears are owed and how much income the occupier has), but also whether eviction really is a “last resort” and what the occupier’s personal circumstances are.

We have recently completed a detailed study exploring how (and whether) this information is made known to judges during the possession process, and what kind of support is available to occupiers. Our findings show that although judges will usually have the facts and figures relating to the payment history available to them, they sometimes have only sketchy information available to them about the occupier’s circumstances more generally. Very few occupiers receive legal advice before the hearing, and it appears that many do not file a defence form or turn up at court to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll