header-logo header-logo

07 October 2016 / Trevor Tayleur
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

A losing vote?

nlj_7717_tayleur

Trevor Tayleur discusses Brexit & the loss of rights

  • EU law provides a range of remedies where individuals have suffered loss owing to the UK government’s failure to implement directives correctly.
  • It is very probable that much UK legislation implementing directives will remain in force post-Brexit. However, Brexit may result in individuals losing some significant rights even if the wording of the UK legislation remains unchanged.

Untangling the UK’s legal systems from the EU legal system is one of the major tasks that the UK will face as part of leaving the EU. While there is disagreement about how much domestic law is derived from EU law, undoubtedly in many important fields EU law exerts considerable influence.

Upon the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, EU law will cease to apply in the UK. Art 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union provides that the EU treaties shall cease to apply to the withdrawing state from the date of withdrawal, while domestically prior to withdrawal the UK Parliament will repeal the European Communities

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll