header-logo header-logo

A losing vote?

07 October 2016 / Trevor Tayleur
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail
nlj_7717_tayleur

Trevor Tayleur discusses Brexit & the loss of rights

  • EU law provides a range of remedies where individuals have suffered loss owing to the UK government’s failure to implement directives correctly.
  • It is very probable that much UK legislation implementing directives will remain in force post-Brexit. However, Brexit may result in individuals losing some significant rights even if the wording of the UK legislation remains unchanged.

Untangling the UK’s legal systems from the EU legal system is one of the major tasks that the UK will face as part of leaving the EU. While there is disagreement about how much domestic law is derived from EU law, undoubtedly in many important fields EU law exerts considerable influence.

Upon the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, EU law will cease to apply in the UK. Art 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union provides that the EU treaties shall cease to apply to the withdrawing state from the date of withdrawal, while domestically prior to withdrawal the UK Parliament will repeal the European Communities

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll