header-logo header-logo

28 November 2012
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Loss of independence?

Proposed SRA rule change over tied advice is criticised

Solicitors are to be allowed to refer clients to tied financial advisors, in a controversial change to professional rules that is almost certain to go ahead.

Currently, solicitors can only refer clients to independent financial advisors. However, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) was due this week to recommend that its board allow solicitors to refer clients to any financial advisor, even where they are “tied” or affiliated to one or more particular institutions or products. Solicitors will need to ensure clients are involved in the decision-making leading to the referral.

Agnieszka Scott, SRA director of policy, says: “This represents the best fit with outcomes-focused regulation as solicitors, as highly qualified professionals, would be free to assess and discuss clients’ needs, not be restricted by a prescriptive rule.”

Critics of the code of conduct change argue it breaches the professional principle that advice should be independent, and could lead to mis-selling claims being brought against solicitors.

Ian Muirhead, chairman of Solicitors for Independent Financial Advice, says relaxing the rules is wrong “in principle”.

“The ethics of the profession are based on independence and being able to give conflict-free advice. Wrong referrals will come back to bite solicitors in terms of damaging their reputation and the reputation of the profession as a whole, and will lead to claims on the solicitors’ compensation fund.

“There is no way solicitors will be able to explain the merits of the different advisors to clients. They will be tainted by the quality of the referral, and implicated in bad advice. It puts solicitors in an invidious position.”

The Law Society has also warned of a risk that solicitors could face negligence actions if they refer clients to an advisor who gives poor advice.

The reason for the rule-change is the new retail distribution review regime being introduced by the Financial Services Authority on 31 December 2012, under which independent financial advisers will have to tell clients whether they are truly independent or tied to one or more products. The SRA consulted on its proposals in July.

Issue: 7540 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll