header-logo header-logo

13 March 2008 / David Burrows
Issue: 7312 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

A lost decade

Practitioners have been kept waiting for too long for improvements to the Family Proceedings Rules, says David Burrows

In 1995, Lord Woolf began a comprehensive review of civil courts’ procedures. His committee produced two wide-ranging sets of reports. The Civil Procedure Rules 1998 were made in consequence. These rules came into force on 1 April 1999, but did not at that stage apply to family proceedings (CPR 1998 r 2.2(1)). Nearly 10 years later, as a lawyer whose work is in mostly family proceedings, I still have—of necessity, and for occasional reference—my 1998 Green Book (containing County Court Rules 1981) and a 1999 White Book (Rules of the Supreme Court 1965). The Family Court Practice still reproduces parts of both sets of rules; and many family lawyers will probably only rarely have to look at the 1998 rules.

On 22 February 2008 the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) with Her Majesty’s Court Service produced Family Proceedings Rules: A new Procedural Code for Family Proceedings, a response to consultation CP(R) 19/06

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
FIFA’s 2026 Men's World Cup is already mired in controversy, with complaints over ‘excessive prices’ and opaque ticketing. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys warns that governing bodies may face scrutiny under EU competition law, with allegations of a ‘dominant—if not monopolistic—position’ in ticket sales
Ten years after Brexit, UK and EU trade mark regimes are drifting apart in practice if not principle. Writing in NLJ this week, Roger Lush and Lara Elder of Carpmaels & Ransford highlight tighter UK scrutiny after SkyKick, where overly broad filings may signal ‘bad faith’
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
back-to-top-scroll