header-logo header-logo

13 March 2008 / David Burrows
Issue: 7312 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

A lost decade

Practitioners have been kept waiting for too long for improvements to the Family Proceedings Rules, says David Burrows

In 1995, Lord Woolf began a comprehensive review of civil courts’ procedures. His committee produced two wide-ranging sets of reports. The Civil Procedure Rules 1998 were made in consequence. These rules came into force on 1 April 1999, but did not at that stage apply to family proceedings (CPR 1998 r 2.2(1)). Nearly 10 years later, as a lawyer whose work is in mostly family proceedings, I still have—of necessity, and for occasional reference—my 1998 Green Book (containing County Court Rules 1981) and a 1999 White Book (Rules of the Supreme Court 1965). The Family Court Practice still reproduces parts of both sets of rules; and many family lawyers will probably only rarely have to look at the 1998 rules.

On 22 February 2008 the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) with Her Majesty’s Court Service produced Family Proceedings Rules: A new Procedural Code for Family Proceedings, a response to consultation CP(R) 19/06

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll