header-logo header-logo

Lost years

20 April 2007 / Peter Ferguson KC
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Is the compensation scheme for unlawful imprisonment unjust? Peter Ferguson reports

The decision of the House of Lords in R (O’Brien) v Independent Assessor [2007] UKHL 10, [2007] All ER (D) 239 (Mar) will be of importance not only to people who have an existing claim for compensation under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (CJA 1988), s 133 but also for those whose claims had been accepted, by 19 April 2006, for an ex gratia payment. It is open to speculation whether the majority’s conclusions may have been influenced by the recent government policy change.

In a ministerial statement in April 2006 the Home Secretary announced, with immediate effect, the abolition of the discretionary scheme and the independent assessor’s new approach of discounting under CJA 1988, s 133(4A) at a higher rate any non-pecuniary awards to reflect the claimant’s previous record and conduct leading to his wrongful imprisonment. The government also proposed legislating to allow reduction in the total award—in exceptional cases, even to nil—to reflect prior record and bad conduct; to cap individual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll