header-logo header-logo

20 April 2007 / Peter Ferguson KC
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Lost years

Is the compensation scheme for unlawful imprisonment unjust? Peter Ferguson reports

The decision of the House of Lords in R (O’Brien) v Independent Assessor [2007] UKHL 10, [2007] All ER (D) 239 (Mar) will be of importance not only to people who have an existing claim for compensation under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (CJA 1988), s 133 but also for those whose claims had been accepted, by 19 April 2006, for an ex gratia payment. It is open to speculation whether the majority’s conclusions may have been influenced by the recent government policy change.

In a ministerial statement in April 2006 the Home Secretary announced, with immediate effect, the abolition of the discretionary scheme and the independent assessor’s new approach of discounting under CJA 1988, s 133(4A) at a higher rate any non-pecuniary awards to reflect the claimant’s previous record and conduct leading to his wrongful imprisonment. The government also proposed legislating to allow reduction in the total award—in exceptional cases, even to nil—to reflect prior record and bad conduct; to cap individual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll