header-logo header-logo

Lost years

20 April 2007 / Peter Ferguson KC
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Is the compensation scheme for unlawful imprisonment unjust? Peter Ferguson reports

The decision of the House of Lords in R (O’Brien) v Independent Assessor [2007] UKHL 10, [2007] All ER (D) 239 (Mar) will be of importance not only to people who have an existing claim for compensation under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (CJA 1988), s 133 but also for those whose claims had been accepted, by 19 April 2006, for an ex gratia payment. It is open to speculation whether the majority’s conclusions may have been influenced by the recent government policy change.

In a ministerial statement in April 2006 the Home Secretary announced, with immediate effect, the abolition of the discretionary scheme and the independent assessor’s new approach of discounting under CJA 1988, s 133(4A) at a higher rate any non-pecuniary awards to reflect the claimant’s previous record and conduct leading to his wrongful imprisonment. The government also proposed legislating to allow reduction in the total award—in exceptional cases, even to nil—to reflect prior record and bad conduct; to cap individual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll