header-logo header-logo

A lottery for litigants?

12 March 2009 / Paula Jefferson
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Features , Public , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Paula Jefferson provides an update on limitation

Approaching the 30th anniversary of a major statute, one might think that its interpretation would be fairly well established and litigation as to the meaning of its words and phrases would be minimal. Sadly, with regard to the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980), that seems far from the case. This continuing and costly pursuit of clarification surely supports the need for reform. It is now nearly 10 years since the Law Commission identified and proposed changes. The government last year confirmed its intention to revisit limitation but, at its earliest, a draft Bill will not be published before July 2009.

In the meantime practitioners and their clients are left with a wealth of judgments and commentary from which to try and determine how and when the issue of limitation will apply. Looking at the decisions in 2008 and applying them in practice, the current situation is as follows.

Fittingly, to start the year, January 2008 saw the decision in A v Hoare

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll