header-logo header-logo

A lottery for litigants?

12 March 2009 / Paula Jefferson
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Features , Public , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Paula Jefferson provides an update on limitation

Approaching the 30th anniversary of a major statute, one might think that its interpretation would be fairly well established and litigation as to the meaning of its words and phrases would be minimal. Sadly, with regard to the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980), that seems far from the case. This continuing and costly pursuit of clarification surely supports the need for reform. It is now nearly 10 years since the Law Commission identified and proposed changes. The government last year confirmed its intention to revisit limitation but, at its earliest, a draft Bill will not be published before July 2009.

In the meantime practitioners and their clients are left with a wealth of judgments and commentary from which to try and determine how and when the issue of limitation will apply. Looking at the decisions in 2008 and applying them in practice, the current situation is as follows.

Fittingly, to start the year, January 2008 saw the decision in A v Hoare

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll