header-logo header-logo

Low Commission uncovers "sobering" social welfare gaps

09 January 2014
Issue: 7590 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Report published following year-long independent inquiry into social welfare advice

The Low Commission has called for legal aid to be brought back for housing cases as part of urgent reforms to social welfare law. 

The year-long independent inquiry, set up by the Legal Action Group and led by cross-bencher Lord Low, recommends a national strategy for advice and legal support. A government minister should be appointed with a cross-departmental brief, to oversee implementation of this strategy, it says, while a £100m implementation fund should be set up, half-funded by central government and half raised from other sources, including a levy on payday loan companies.

It found that urgent reform is required of the exceptional funding provisions, introduced by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) as a safety net, and called for the restoration of legal aid for housing disrepair and protection from harassment and unlawful eviction, so that people can get legal help before they face imminent eviction. 

According to the report, the cuts imposed by LASPO—about £89m per annum—as well as reduced local authority spend have shrunk the advice sector at a time of increased need and, “as a result, instead of saving money, the cutbacks are very likely to end up costing more elsewhere in the system”.

Lord Low says his findings make “sobering reading”.

“All around the country we found advice agencies buckling under the strain, and ordinary people left with nowhere to turn.”

The report found advice agencies struggling around the country. In Gloucester, for example, housing charity Shelter has closed its office, the CAB has gone into administration, and demand for immigration and debt advice at Gloucester Law Centre has doubled. 

In Birmingham, the CAB lost £700,000 in legal aid funding and half its local authority grant. Swansea and Neath Port Talbot CAB had to lose 12 of its 36 staff because of 30% cuts in budget.

The inquiry is the biggest ever into the provision of social welfare advice in England and Wales, and took evidence from 250 individuals. 

Amanda Finlay, commission vice-chair and former legal services strategy director at the Ministry of Justice, says: “Just cutting legal aid is not the answer. The problems still remain."

Issue: 7590 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll