header-logo header-logo

Low but multi

09 September 2016
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Where a low value road traffic personal injury claim exits the protocol with a CPR Part 7 claim which is allocated to the multi-track, do fixed recoverable costs apply?

If the exit was for a reason associated with the claimant’s default within CPR 45.24 (for example, acting unreasonably by exiting) then the defendant’s costs liability may be limited to fixed costs and allowable disbursements. Subject to this, while there is a fixed costs regime in place, it only applies to claims for no more than £25,000. Therefore, if the complexion of the claim has changed and it has been allocated to the multi-track on value grounds (over £25,000) then costs will be at large and the usual discretion will apply although an attempt could be made at the costs budgeting stage to limit the costs to fixed costs. If, however, the claim is for under £25,000 but has been allocated to the multi-track because of some complexity or allegation of fraud, we consider it is highly arguable that the fixed costs regime is still capable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll