header-logo header-logo

Low but multi

09 September 2016
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Where a low value road traffic personal injury claim exits the protocol with a CPR Part 7 claim which is allocated to the multi-track, do fixed recoverable costs apply?

If the exit was for a reason associated with the claimant’s default within CPR 45.24 (for example, acting unreasonably by exiting) then the defendant’s costs liability may be limited to fixed costs and allowable disbursements. Subject to this, while there is a fixed costs regime in place, it only applies to claims for no more than £25,000. Therefore, if the complexion of the claim has changed and it has been allocated to the multi-track on value grounds (over £25,000) then costs will be at large and the usual discretion will apply although an attempt could be made at the costs budgeting stage to limit the costs to fixed costs. If, however, the claim is for under £25,000 but has been allocated to the multi-track because of some complexity or allegation of fraud, we consider it is highly arguable that the fixed costs regime is still capable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll