header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

LSC backs down in duty solicitor battle

The Legal Services Commission (LSC) has agreed to extend its consultation exercise on planned changes to the way duty solicitor slots are allocated following threats of legal action by the Law Society.

The society issued a pre-action protocol letter to the LSC challenging the way it is consulting on changes to the original plans to award duty solicitor slots to law firms as part of its market stability measures.

A society spokeswoman says that before Easter, the LSC decided to change the new basis for duty solicitor rota allocations for 2007–08. Having decided on one option for doing this in February, it then decided to propose an alternative option and planned to allow just two weeks to consult with representative bodies.

“Following pressure from the Law Society, the LSC has conceded that its recent proposal for a further, brief consultation on market stability measures was seriously flawed. It will now conduct a full and proper consultation on the matter,” she adds.
Derek Hill, director of the Criminal Defence Service at the LSC says: “In keeping with requests from the Law Society, we will be writing to providers to ask their opinion about methods to allocate duty slots up until October. Therefore, we are extending our current consultation exercise until 17 May.”

This means, he says, that until at least the end of June duty slots will continue to be allocated on the current rotas. The old duty solicitor arrangements will apply until then.

Meanwhile, the society claimed another victory last week when the government announced plans to retain the current small claims limits of £1,000 for personal injury and housing disrepair claims.

Society chief executive, Desmond Hudson, says: “I’m pleased the government has accepted the evidence in the Law Society’s ‘Fast and Fair’ campaign that an increase in the small claims limit for personal injury cases would deprive many people injured as a result of someone else’s negligence of compensation. We agree with the government that the right approach is to improve the process for dealing with lower value cases rather than depriving people of help from a solicitor.”

The government is also proposing an increase to the fast track limit to £25,000 and the introduction of a streamlined claims process for personal injury claims under £25,000.
 

Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
back-to-top-scroll