header-logo header-logo

LSC misses targets

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Legal aid

In what was a “challenging year” the Legal Services Commission (LSC) achieved only 22 out of 35 key performance indicators, according to its annual report.

The report says that legal aid had funded more than 2.5m cases in the past year and maintained 100% coverage of the duty solicitor schemes. However, the report states that providers had failed to achieve targets in ensuring that all crime contracts had a peer review or quality assessment by 31 March this year and had not increased their satisfaction score by the target of 5%.

It was also reported that fixed fees for advocates, solicitors and counsel had not been introduced by April 2008 and that delays had affected the introduction of other fixed fee schemes.

The annual review did make clear, however, that the LSC had met its target of operating within the overall fund allocation for the year.

Issue: 7336 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll