header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

LSC misses targets

Legal aid

In what was a “challenging year” the Legal Services Commission (LSC) achieved only 22 out of 35 key performance indicators, according to its annual report.

The report says that legal aid had funded more than 2.5m cases in the past year and maintained 100% coverage of the duty solicitor schemes. However, the report states that providers had failed to achieve targets in ensuring that all crime contracts had a peer review or quality assessment by 31 March this year and had not increased their satisfaction score by the target of 5%.

It was also reported that fixed fees for advocates, solicitors and counsel had not been introduced by April 2008 and that delays had affected the introduction of other fixed fee schemes.

The annual review did make clear, however, that the LSC had met its target of operating within the overall fund allocation for the year.

Issue: 7336 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll