header-logo header-logo

Magistrates matter

04 July 2025 / Tom Franklin
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
224745
The volunteer judiciary has faced neglect. Tom Franklin explains why addressing this is important—for all parts of the legal system

Most readers of the New Law Journal will need little reminding that our justice system has, for too long, operated on goodwill stretched to breaking point. The strain on criminal legal aid, the crisis in court maintenance, the exodus from the Crown Prosecution Service and private defence practice—none of this is news to solicitors and barristers. What is perhaps less widely discussed, though, is that magistrates—the volunteer judiciary who hear over 90% of criminal cases—have faced similar neglect, while helping to prop up an overstretched system.

The ‘Magistrates Matter’ report, recently published by the Magistrates’ Association, the only membership body and independent voice for magistrates, does not ask for miracles. It sets out seven practical, modest recommendations to recognise and retain this vital volunteer force—and to help ensure that the courts they serve are resilient, effective and trusted by the public. These recommendations cost little in the scheme of things, but their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll