header-logo header-logo

04 July 2025 / Tom Franklin
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Magistrates matter

224745
The volunteer judiciary has faced neglect. Tom Franklin explains why addressing this is important—for all parts of the legal system

Most readers of the New Law Journal will need little reminding that our justice system has, for too long, operated on goodwill stretched to breaking point. The strain on criminal legal aid, the crisis in court maintenance, the exodus from the Crown Prosecution Service and private defence practice—none of this is news to solicitors and barristers. What is perhaps less widely discussed, though, is that magistrates—the volunteer judiciary who hear over 90% of criminal cases—have faced similar neglect, while helping to prop up an overstretched system.

The ‘Magistrates Matter’ report, recently published by the Magistrates’ Association, the only membership body and independent voice for magistrates, does not ask for miracles. It sets out seven practical, modest recommendations to recognise and retain this vital volunteer force—and to help ensure that the courts they serve are resilient, effective and trusted by the public. These recommendations cost little in the scheme of things, but their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll