header-logo header-logo

30 January 2009
Issue: 7354 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , Damages , Personal injury , In Court
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws—Tort—Damages—Assessment

Maher and another v Groupama Grand Est, [2009] EWHC 38 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 183 (Jan)

Queen’s Bench Division, Blair J, 23 January 2009

In a claim against an overseas insurer, the High Court has held (i) whether a claim can be brought by an injured party directly against the wrongdoer’s insurers is a contractual question, governed by the law applicable to the insurance contract, and (ii) that the right to claim interest by way of damages in a claim in tort is properly characterised as an issue of tort and is not, in any sense, a procedural question for the law of the forum.

Barnard Doherty (instructed by Beachcroft LLP) for the claimants. Pierre Janusz (instructed by Pierre Thomas & Partners) for the defendant.

'It was well established that the assessment of damages in tort was a procedural matter'

In July 2005, while driving in France, the claimants were injured in a collision with a van. The van’s driver died as a result. The claimants brought an action in England seeking

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll