header-logo header-logo

Conflict of laws—Tort—Damages—Assessment

30 January 2009
Issue: 7354 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , Damages , Personal injury , In Court
printer mail-detail

Maher and another v Groupama Grand Est, [2009] EWHC 38 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 183 (Jan)

Queen’s Bench Division, Blair J, 23 January 2009

In a claim against an overseas insurer, the High Court has held (i) whether a claim can be brought by an injured party directly against the wrongdoer’s insurers is a contractual question, governed by the law applicable to the insurance contract, and (ii) that the right to claim interest by way of damages in a claim in tort is properly characterised as an issue of tort and is not, in any sense, a procedural question for the law of the forum.

Barnard Doherty (instructed by Beachcroft LLP) for the claimants. Pierre Janusz (instructed by Pierre Thomas & Partners) for the defendant.

'It was well established that the assessment of damages in tort was a procedural matter'

In July 2005, while driving in France, the claimants were injured in a collision with a van. The van’s driver died as a result. The claimants brought an action in England seeking

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll