header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026 / Janet Carter
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Features , In Court , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Maintaining Magna Carta

241900

Janet Carter sets out how to retain ‘judgment by peers’ for all trials with a new plan

  • The government’s plan aims to bring about fair and faster justice for defendants and victims.
  • This article proposes using a specialist magistrates’ trial panel to slash the queue to enable faster jury trial for offences above 18 months’ custody.

With its plan to modernise the criminal courts and cut delays, the government’s end game is to reduce the court backlog and enable fair and faster justice for defendants and victims. Many of us desperately want to achieve this by retaining Magna Carta’s ‘judgment by peers’ by using juries and magistrates for all trials, alongside an increased efficiency in using every courtroom, every day. We can do this, but the plan needs to change.

Shortage of magistrates

One of the proposals in the plan is to maintain trial by peers by sitting two lay magistrates with a judge in an intermediate ‘swift court’ for cases between 18 months and 3 years. However, there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Banking and finance practice bolstered by partner hire

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

Commercial litigation team welcomes senior associate in Birmingham

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll