header-logo header-logo

Making a stand

14 July 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Should councillors have standing to challenge a procurement decision of their authority? Nicholas Dobson traces the arguments on both sides

  • Councillors had no standing to challenge a procurement decision of their authority since: (i) they could not establish that a competitive tendering exercise would produce a different outcome and; (ii) they were unable to establish any direct impact upon them which would arise from such an exercise.

For many people standing will mean only how they must endure their twice daily rail commute. But for lawyers the term (known in less demotic times as locus standi ) refers to the fact that to apply for judicial review, prospective claimants must satisfy the court that they have ‘sufficient interest in the matter to which the application relates’ (s 31(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981).

So would local authority councillors wishing to challenge a procurement decision in their authority have standing? Surprisingly (in the view of many), no. Such was the decision of Dove J on 9 March 2017 in Wylde and others v Waverley

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll