header-logo header-logo

18 February 2022 / Faras Baloch
Issue: 7967 / Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal , Technology , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail

Man or machine? AI in criminal cases

Faras Baloch charts the potential role of artificial intelligence in disclosure & privilege review in criminal cases
  • How computers ‘learn’ from humans.
  • The potential complications of large datasets.
  • What we can expect from AI in the future.

Artificial intelligence or ‘AI’ generally describes a computer solving problems in a way that a human might. It encompasses ‘machine learning’ which involves a computer classifying data and learning when it makes mistakes.

Machine learning algorithms have a vast number of applications which include providing personalised recommendations in search engines, identifying unwanted emails through spam filters, and assisting medical practitioners diagnose illness.

Increasingly, lawyers are harnessing this technology to assist in the review of large datasets. In this context, the term ‘machine learning’ is used interchangeably with ‘Technology Assisted Review’ (TAR) and ‘Computer Assisted Review’ (CAR).

How does it work?

It works in a similar way to an email spam filter. The spam filter categorises emails as either ‘spam’ or ‘not spam’ and removes the spam

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll