header-logo header-logo

Man or machine? AI in criminal cases

18 February 2022 / Faras Baloch
Issue: 7967 / Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal , Technology , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail
Faras Baloch charts the potential role of artificial intelligence in disclosure & privilege review in criminal cases
  • How computers ‘learn’ from humans.
  • The potential complications of large datasets.
  • What we can expect from AI in the future.

Artificial intelligence or ‘AI’ generally describes a computer solving problems in a way that a human might. It encompasses ‘machine learning’ which involves a computer classifying data and learning when it makes mistakes.

Machine learning algorithms have a vast number of applications which include providing personalised recommendations in search engines, identifying unwanted emails through spam filters, and assisting medical practitioners diagnose illness.

Increasingly, lawyers are harnessing this technology to assist in the review of large datasets. In this context, the term ‘machine learning’ is used interchangeably with ‘Technology Assisted Review’ (TAR) and ‘Computer Assisted Review’ (CAR).

How does it work?

It works in a similar way to an email spam filter. The spam filter categorises emails as either ‘spam’ or ‘not spam’ and removes the spam

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll