header-logo header-logo

Man or machine? AI in criminal cases

18 February 2022 / Faras Baloch
Issue: 7967 / Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal , Technology , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail
Faras Baloch charts the potential role of artificial intelligence in disclosure & privilege review in criminal cases
  • How computers ‘learn’ from humans.
  • The potential complications of large datasets.
  • What we can expect from AI in the future.

Artificial intelligence or ‘AI’ generally describes a computer solving problems in a way that a human might. It encompasses ‘machine learning’ which involves a computer classifying data and learning when it makes mistakes.

Machine learning algorithms have a vast number of applications which include providing personalised recommendations in search engines, identifying unwanted emails through spam filters, and assisting medical practitioners diagnose illness.

Increasingly, lawyers are harnessing this technology to assist in the review of large datasets. In this context, the term ‘machine learning’ is used interchangeably with ‘Technology Assisted Review’ (TAR) and ‘Computer Assisted Review’ (CAR).

How does it work?

It works in a similar way to an email spam filter. The spam filter categorises emails as either ‘spam’ or ‘not spam’ and removes the spam

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll