header-logo header-logo

07 February 2014
Issue: 7594 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mandatory CPD to end?

SRA launches Training for tomorrow consultation

Prescribed CPD (continuing professional development) requirements would be made a thing of the past under the latest Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) proposals. Instead, non-mandatory guidance would be issued to both entities and individuals.  In a consultation launched this week, Training for tomorrow, the SRA emphasised that CPD is central to securing good outcomes for consumers, and that the aim of the proposed reform would be to ensure “continuing competence”. Julie Brannan, SRA director of education and training, says the SRA hope to increase firms’ flexibility in arranging their training needs. The consultation closes on 2 April 2014.

 

Issue: 7594 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll