header-logo header-logo

03 July 2008
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Manzoor warns Law Society on complaints handling

Legal news

The Law Society is continuing to miss targets on complaints handling and narrowly escaped its second fine in one month last week.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and the Legal Complaints Service (LCS) failed to meet five out of 13 targets on timeliness, quality and use of resources. They exceeded two and met six targets.

Legal Services Complaints Commissioner Zahida Manzoor, who fined the Law Society £275,000 for its inadequate 2008/09 plan in the first week of June, stresses that her decision to issue a warning rather than a fine this time “is not a cause for celebration”. Further effort is needed, especially on targets measuring “adherence to quality processes”, she says.

She adds, however: “I am pleased that jointly LCS and SRA met their overall target to close 67% of cases within three months (the LCS achieved 63% and the SRA 77%). Since I was appointed in 2004 and began setting targets, the number of older cases has reduced substantially and complaints are being handled more quickly. This is good news for the consumer.”

The SRA and LCS will be considered separately in future after the SRA performed notably better. It hit five of its six quality targets while the LCS achieved only three of its seven quality targets.

Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll