header-logo header-logo

Matrimonial property

30 May 2013
Issue: 7562 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

DR v GR and others [2013] EWHC 1196 (Fam), [2013] All ER (D) 230 (May)

In Petrodel Resources Ltd & Ors v Prest & Ors [2013] 1 All ER 795 (Prest), the Court of Appeal had held that the previous authorities as to the scope of s 24(1)(a) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 had been wrong. The companies before the court contended that the effect of Prest was that the view taken in Hope v Krecji [2012] All ER (D) 215 (Jul) as to the scope of the s 24(1)(c) powers waswrong also. They contended that interposition of the companies meant that the court could not directly deal with the assets at the bottom of the tree. The court ruled that if the companies’ argument as to the effect of Prest was right, the jurisdiction would be almost totally emasculated. That was because it was only in rare cases that the settlement directly owned the underlying assets. In the great majority of cases there was an interposed company and it was usually offshore.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll