header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
02 May 2013 / Francesca Kaye , Mary Hodgson
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

A matter of discretion

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Francesca Kaye & Mary Hodgson offer some hope for solicitors pursued for breach of trust

A number of lenders are seeking to reduce losses sustained after the sale of repossessed properties by pursuing breach of trust claims. This may be because solicitors are perceived to have deep pockets, but with no deduction for contributory negligence, breach of trust claims can also avoid close scrutiny of lending policies and mortgage applications.

There have been several recent decisions of note on the application of s 61 of the Trustee Act 1925, as well as consideration of what constitutes a breach of trust. These are covered briefly below along with the decision in Nationwide Building Society v Davisons Solicitors (a firm) [2012] EWCA Civ 1626, which offers some hope to firms pursued for breach of trust in the event of being involved (however inadvertently) in a fraud.

Completion & breach of trust

The Council of Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook for England and Wales establishes at cl 10, that completing solicitors acting for a lender

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll