header-logo header-logo

02 May 2013 / Francesca Kaye , Mary Hodgson
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

A matter of discretion

Francesca Kaye & Mary Hodgson offer some hope for solicitors pursued for breach of trust

A number of lenders are seeking to reduce losses sustained after the sale of repossessed properties by pursuing breach of trust claims. This may be because solicitors are perceived to have deep pockets, but with no deduction for contributory negligence, breach of trust claims can also avoid close scrutiny of lending policies and mortgage applications.

There have been several recent decisions of note on the application of s 61 of the Trustee Act 1925, as well as consideration of what constitutes a breach of trust. These are covered briefly below along with the decision in Nationwide Building Society v Davisons Solicitors (a firm) [2012] EWCA Civ 1626, which offers some hope to firms pursued for breach of trust in the event of being involved (however inadvertently) in a fraud.

Completion & breach of trust

The Council of Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook for England and Wales establishes at cl 10, that completing solicitors acting for a lender

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll