header-logo header-logo

A matter of discretion

02 May 2013 / Francesca Kaye , Mary Hodgson
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Francesca Kaye & Mary Hodgson offer some hope for solicitors pursued for breach of trust

A number of lenders are seeking to reduce losses sustained after the sale of repossessed properties by pursuing breach of trust claims. This may be because solicitors are perceived to have deep pockets, but with no deduction for contributory negligence, breach of trust claims can also avoid close scrutiny of lending policies and mortgage applications.

There have been several recent decisions of note on the application of s 61 of the Trustee Act 1925, as well as consideration of what constitutes a breach of trust. These are covered briefly below along with the decision in Nationwide Building Society v Davisons Solicitors (a firm) [2012] EWCA Civ 1626, which offers some hope to firms pursued for breach of trust in the event of being involved (however inadvertently) in a fraud.

Completion & breach of trust

The Council of Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook for England and Wales establishes at cl 10, that completing solicitors acting for a lender

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll