header-logo header-logo

21 June 2012 / Tony Allen
Issue: 7519 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Mediation , Damages , ADR
printer mail-detail

A matter of trust

Should mediators (& mediation) be trusted? Tony Allen reports

An article in NLJ last September asked if mediators can be legally trusted, and this needs an answer (“Can you trust a mediator?” NLJ, 23 September 2011, p 1288).

During a mediation of a reasonable provision claim from an artist’s estate, the mediator brought to the claimant the defendants’ offer of a cash sum plus one of the deceased’s painting, saying that the painting had been professionally valued at £80,000 “If sold at auction”, producing a written valuation obtained by the defendants the previous day. The offer was accepted by the claimant “in reliance on the mediator’s representation that the valuation was a market valuation” (see Clay v Lenkiewicz Foundation (Plymouth County Court 9PL05124)).

However, the valuation was for insuring the cost of purchasing a similar painting if lost or destroyed, rather higher than market value, so the claimant started fresh proceedings, seeking damages over the allegedly material misrepresentation which induced the mediated settlement.

The new proceedings settled before

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll