header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
03 February 2021 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7919 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Matters of dishonesty

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
38169
Alec Samuels explores a basic concept of criminal law
  • Explores what is meant by dishonesty in the context of criminal law.

Dishonesty is a fundamental concept in the criminal law. A substantial part of the criminal law of property is based in theft and aggravated theft, namely dishonesty. In many cases the basic issue for the jury is: has the prosecution proved D to be dishonest? So, it could hardly be more important that the legal concept is clear beyond any doubt. The law is to be found in the judgment of Lord Hughes in Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017] UKSC 67, recently applied in Group Seven v Nasir [2019] EWCA Civ 614, [2019] 3 WLR 1011, paras [25]-[58], and now R v Barton [2020] EWCA Crim 575.

Objectivity & subjectivity

Honesty is an objective standard, the standard of society, the standard expected of all of us, not any old subjective standard or lack of standard applied by D. Honesty is what most ordinary decent people in society take

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll