header-logo header-logo

May vote brings more chaos

12 December 2018
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

PM stands ready to deliver on Brexit, if she gets backing in leadership campaign

Britain faced yet more Brexit woes this week as Conservative MPs attempted to trigger a leadership contest less than four months before Exit Day.

The required 48 letters were sent this week amid a wave of fury that Prime Minister Theresa May postponed the House of Commons vote on her Brexit deal. May said she stood ‘ready to finish the job’.

Meanwhile, calls for a second referendum escalated after the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that the UK can unilaterally revoke its Art 50 notification of intention to withdraw from the EU. The ruling, in Wightman & Ors v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU (Case C-621/18), backs Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona’s Advisory Opinion last week.

The ECJ rejected the arguments of the Council of Ministers and European Commission that the consent of all the other Member States was required for revocation. It ruled that the UK can choose to stay in the EU at any time while the treaties still apply, whether in the two-year period from official notification of Art 50 or in any extension of this period agreed with the European Council. The UK would need to make a decision to remain, taken in accord with our constitutional requirements and then duly notified to the President of the European Council.

Charles Brasted, partner at Hogan Lovells, said the ruling ‘put beyond doubt that, until the moment the UK signs a withdrawal agreement or leaves the EU with no deal on 29 March 2019, it can still stop Brexit, even in the face of opposition by the rest of the EU. 

‘If it did so, the UK could also retain its current terms of membership, including the “rebate” negotiated by Mrs Thatcher, and it would be under no obligation to join the Euro. It is important to note that the ruling only bites if the UK decides to cancel Brexit and the EU27 disagree.’

The judicial review was brought by a cross-party group of politicians and Jolyon Maugham QC, of Devereux Chambers.

Downing Street has responded that the ruling is hypothetical as the UK will not revoke Art 50.

Issue: 7821 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll