header-logo header-logo

04 August 2011 / Michael Cook
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

The meat in the sandwich

Michael Cook is hungry for all fast-track costs to be fixed

Fixed fast-track costs were a basic tenet of the Woolf reforms but they were introduced for fast-track trials only. That is unsurprising. Lord Woolf’s Access to Justice report contained a suggested costs scale or matrix, taking into account the weight and complexity of the case and the stage it had reached, which was met with almost universal condemnation. Various pilot schemes threw out widely-differing results, serving only to highlight the difficulty in obtaining the necessary data and translating it into a regime of fixed costs for an as yet unknown practice and procedure. The lord chancellor therefore postponed the introduction of fixed fast-track pre-trial costs until the fast-track had been running long enough for the amount of work involved in it to be ascertained and evaluated.

It has now been running for 14 years. The certainty of fixed costs was at the heart of Lord Woolf’s proposals, although the costs must

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll