header-logo header-logo

Mediation dispute

03 March 2011
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New divorce policy may suffer for lack of mediators

A lack of accredited mediators could stymie the Ministry of Justice’s new policy of compulsory mediation for divorcing couples.

From 6 April, anyone wishing to contest the terms of their divorce will need to first attend a mediation awareness session, with or without their spouse or partner, and must present evidence of this before their case can be accepted by the court. The family proceedings rules have been amended to include the requirement.

David Allison, chairman of family lawyers’ group Resolution, said there was uncertainty as to “mediator capacity”.

“We don’t know how many people will be able to do this from day one. If not, they will tell the court they tried to access a mediator but couldn’t, and that’s all they’ll have to do.

“There is nothing in the protocol about kitemarking of mediators. Most people will be pointed in the right direction by a solicitor, but where people are issuing proceedings themselves they may go to an unaccredited one, there may be rogue mediators.

“It would have been better to do this in a planned way so that enough mediators were in place but the government has acted in haste.”
However, Allison broadly welcomed the proposals, which were announced last week.

“A good solicitor doing their job properly would discuss the option of mediation with a client anyway,” he said.

“I guess that’s something different from going along and having a talk with a mediation assessor. In so far as this raises awareness it is good—there is no doubt more people could mediate than do currently.”

Cases where there are allegations of domestic violence or child protection issues will be exempt from the requirement.

David Norgrove, who is reviewing the family justice system, is due to publish his interim report later this month.

Issue: 7455 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll