header-logo header-logo

03 March 2011
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mediation dispute

New divorce policy may suffer for lack of mediators

A lack of accredited mediators could stymie the Ministry of Justice’s new policy of compulsory mediation for divorcing couples.

From 6 April, anyone wishing to contest the terms of their divorce will need to first attend a mediation awareness session, with or without their spouse or partner, and must present evidence of this before their case can be accepted by the court. The family proceedings rules have been amended to include the requirement.

David Allison, chairman of family lawyers’ group Resolution, said there was uncertainty as to “mediator capacity”.

“We don’t know how many people will be able to do this from day one. If not, they will tell the court they tried to access a mediator but couldn’t, and that’s all they’ll have to do.

“There is nothing in the protocol about kitemarking of mediators. Most people will be pointed in the right direction by a solicitor, but where people are issuing proceedings themselves they may go to an unaccredited one, there may be rogue mediators.

“It would have been better to do this in a planned way so that enough mediators were in place but the government has acted in haste.”
However, Allison broadly welcomed the proposals, which were announced last week.

“A good solicitor doing their job properly would discuss the option of mediation with a client anyway,” he said.

“I guess that’s something different from going along and having a talk with a mediation assessor. In so far as this raises awareness it is good—there is no doubt more people could mediate than do currently.”

Cases where there are allegations of domestic violence or child protection issues will be exempt from the requirement.

David Norgrove, who is reviewing the family justice system, is due to publish his interim report later this month.

Issue: 7455 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll