header-logo header-logo

Mediation remodelled

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail

In Brief

The Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution’s Model Mediation Agreement has been revised in a bid to reflect mediation’s increased integration into regular litigation practice. Under the new standard procedure, parties will still share mediator costs equally, but parties will be able to claim mediation expenses as costs in the case if the matter goes to trial. The rules on mediation confidentiality have also been tightened meaning the fact that mediation takes place is not confidential, unless the parties choose otherwise. Additionally, the mediator’s liability is now limited to cases of fraudulent acts or omissions, or those involving wilful misconduct. In the old agreement, a mediator was liable only if shown “to have acted in bad faith”.

Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Mediation , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll