header-logo header-logo

02 June 2017
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Medical practitioner

General Medical Council v Jagjivan and another [2017] EWHC 1247 (Admin), [2017] EWHC 1247 (Admin)

The Divisional Court, in allowing the General Medical Council’s appeal, held that it had jurisdiction, under s 40A(1)(d) of the Medical Act 1983, to appeal, as the Medical Practitioners Tribunal had made a decision not to give a direction under s 35D of the Act. Further, the tribunal’s failure to find that there had been a sexual motivation for the first respondent’s actions had been wrong and unsustainable.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll