Drug companies have been required since 1 January to record any payments to doctors with a view to this becoming publicly searchable knowledge from July 2016. Writing in NLJ this week, Leigh Day solicitor Sarah Moore says the new code aims to encourage transparency, but she questions how successful the initiative will be. Doctors can formally opt out, she notes, while neither private hospitals nor medical device companies are covered by the requirement. Most crucially, she says, the code is voluntary.
13 February 2015
Medical transparency?
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok
Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok
Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon
Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise
Twenty Essex—Thomas Hibbs, Jack Hollingworth & Sam Pearce
Three new tenants join Twenty Essex
NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application
Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
