header-logo header-logo

Mental challenges

30 November 2012 / Gordon Ashton
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

District Judge Gordon Ashton examines capacity & the courts, through the pages of Atkin’s Court Forms

Until recently, few lawyers became involved in mental capacity issues. They were seen as mental health problems and the Court of Protection was viewed as a mysterious world that was best avoided. The 1985 issue of Atkin’s Court Forms Volume 26 entitled Mental Health combined in a single volume the practice in the Court of Protection and Mental Health Review Tribunals with that in High Court and County Court proceedings where a party lacked capacity to litigate. These topics extended to a mere 270 pages and there was little change for the 1992 issue.

Past issues

When I was asked to contribute the High Court and County Court content for the 1996 issue it was apparent to me that the existing material merely repeated the court rules and practice directions with little guidance as to implementation. I attempted to address the assessment of capacity and the basis of decision-making in the context of the questions “When is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll