header-logo header-logo

Mental challenges

30 November 2012 / Gordon Ashton
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

District Judge Gordon Ashton examines capacity & the courts, through the pages of Atkin’s Court Forms

Until recently, few lawyers became involved in mental capacity issues. They were seen as mental health problems and the Court of Protection was viewed as a mysterious world that was best avoided. The 1985 issue of Atkin’s Court Forms Volume 26 entitled Mental Health combined in a single volume the practice in the Court of Protection and Mental Health Review Tribunals with that in High Court and County Court proceedings where a party lacked capacity to litigate. These topics extended to a mere 270 pages and there was little change for the 1992 issue.

Past issues

When I was asked to contribute the High Court and County Court content for the 1996 issue it was apparent to me that the existing material merely repeated the court rules and practice directions with little guidance as to implementation. I attempted to address the assessment of capacity and the basis of decision-making in the context of the questions “When is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll