header-logo header-logo

30 November 2012 / Gordon Ashton
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Mental challenges

District Judge Gordon Ashton examines capacity & the courts, through the pages of Atkin’s Court Forms

Until recently, few lawyers became involved in mental capacity issues. They were seen as mental health problems and the Court of Protection was viewed as a mysterious world that was best avoided. The 1985 issue of Atkin’s Court Forms Volume 26 entitled Mental Health combined in a single volume the practice in the Court of Protection and Mental Health Review Tribunals with that in High Court and County Court proceedings where a party lacked capacity to litigate. These topics extended to a mere 270 pages and there was little change for the 1992 issue.

Past issues

When I was asked to contribute the High Court and County Court content for the 1996 issue it was apparent to me that the existing material merely repeated the court rules and practice directions with little guidance as to implementation. I attempted to address the assessment of capacity and the basis of decision-making in the context of the questions “When is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll