header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
30 November 2012 / Gordon Ashton
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Mental challenges

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

District Judge Gordon Ashton examines capacity & the courts, through the pages of Atkin’s Court Forms

Until recently, few lawyers became involved in mental capacity issues. They were seen as mental health problems and the Court of Protection was viewed as a mysterious world that was best avoided. The 1985 issue of Atkin’s Court Forms Volume 26 entitled Mental Health combined in a single volume the practice in the Court of Protection and Mental Health Review Tribunals with that in High Court and County Court proceedings where a party lacked capacity to litigate. These topics extended to a mere 270 pages and there was little change for the 1992 issue.

Past issues

When I was asked to contribute the High Court and County Court content for the 1996 issue it was apparent to me that the existing material merely repeated the court rules and practice directions with little guidance as to implementation. I attempted to address the assessment of capacity and the basis of decision-making in the context of the questions “When is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll