header-logo header-logo

Merger problems

28 June 2007 / Nick Pointon , Mark Langley-sowter
Issue: 7279 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Contact your broker early if you are considering a merger this year, say Nick Pointon and Mark Langley-Sowter

The post Clementi era has brought with it an increased number of mergers, with numerous high street  practices looking to purchase or merge with their local competitors. In the rush to merge and expand, however, many firms leave the insurance aspect of the deal too late, ignoring warnings that due diligence should include a full investigation of claims records to avoid rocketing professional indemnity premiums.

Insurance brokers need to be notified about any potential mergers before a deal is done, as mergers and acquisitions often create numerous problems for staff and management alike.

Most common is the clash of two or more cultures that inhibits a smooth transition from the outset and can cause some client dissatisfaction in the short term. Re-branding also has an internal implication, which is often missed in the rush to integrate and reduce costs after a takeover. Too often, firms merge with scant regard about the effect of relationships and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Payne Hicks Beach—Craig Parrett

Payne Hicks Beach—Craig Parrett

Insolvency and restructuring practice welcomes new partner

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

North East firm welcomes employment specialist

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Partner joins commercial and technology practice

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll