header-logo header-logo

Merging to defend

24 October 2012
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Cost cutting linked to marked rise in law firm mergers

Cost cutting has led to a sharp rise in mergers of law firms in the last year, according to new research.

Last year, 220 law firm mergers took place, compared with 168 in the previous year—a jump of 31%. However, a survey of 50 law firms by independent finance provider Syscap suggests defensive rather than expansive reasons are driving the trend. The survey was carried out among firms ranging from sole practitioners to large City practices.

More than half said reducing support-staff costs was a major motivation to merge, while more than two-thirds said cutting costs by sharing IT and marketing spend would be a major factor. More than a third said reducing the debt burden of one of the law firms involved would be a major reason.

However, nearly two-thirds of law firms said offering a wider range of services to clients was another reason to merge.

Philip White, CEO of Syscap, says: “This far through the recession we were a little surprised that so many respondents still feel that there are easy efficiencies to be found through trimming staff.

“Smaller law firms are also pursuing mergers so that they can diversify their revenues away from a particular business sector—at the moment that seems to be more of a priority than moving into a faster-growing sector or country.”

Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll