header-logo header-logo

02 September 2026
Issue: 8175 / Categories: Legal News , Online safety , Social Media , Technology , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Meta settlement shows power of civil claims, says online safety lawyer

The Meta settlement indicates civil claims are more effective than regulation when it comes to forcing tech giants to change, according to online safety lawyer Mark Jones

Meta agreed to pay up to $17.1bn (£13.3bn) last week to settle claims brought by 29 US states that Facebook and Instagram failed to protect children using their platforms. But could similar cases arise here?

Jones, partner at Payne Hicks Beach, said: ‘In the UK, families and individuals have compelling evidence that their children suffered serious harm, sometimes with fatal consequences, yet we do not see the same type of large civil claims here.

‘Ofcom can investigate and issue fines to the platforms, but that is not the same as securing justice or compensation for those families. The recent cases in the US against tech companies for online harms, appear to signal that it is civil claims that affect change more than regulation.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll