header-logo header-logo

MIB in "wheel-spin" on untraced drivers

03 March 2017
Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) has been forced to remove a key provision in the Untraced Drivers Agreement 2017, following a campaign led by a solicitor and motor insurance law specialist. The revision was announced within a day of the agreement coming into effect on 1 March 2017. 

The MIB published the replacement scheme on 2 March. It substitutes the earlier scheme dated 10 January 2017 with retrospective effect. Clause 10 of the earlier version prohibited victims from using a solicitor to help them fill out or submit the claim form or to take any active role at the crucial initial stages of the claim on penalty of the entire claim being rejected outright. Solicitor and campaigner, Nicholas Bevan, complained that this was unlawful and with the backing of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers the MIB has now omitted the offending provision but added a requirement that only the claimant can sign the form.

Bevan welcomed the MIB’s action in removing the prohibition on solicitors. However, he warned that "the new agreement is highly unsatisfactory because it fails to provide an equivalent standard of compensatory guarantee required under European law.

"The new agreement still contains a number of unlawful provisions such as the three-year deferral of interest accruing and the lack of any suitable requirement for independent legal representation of minors and mentally handicapped victims. These are likely to be challenged in the future. They've hit reverse but gone into a wheel-spin.” Read more: http://bit.ly/2mAy7lL

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll