header-logo header-logo

18 July 2012
Issue: 7523 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Minicabs v taxis

Minicabs not allowed to use bus lanes

The High Court has rejected a legal bid for minicabs to use London bus lanes. Mr Justice Burton dismissed Addison Lee’s claim for judicial review of the policy, which allows black cabs but not minicabs to use the lanes. He described the reasoning behind Transport for London’s policy as “obvious and compelling”.

TfL argued that customers can hail a taxi but not a minicab, therefore it makes sense for those taxis to be near the kerb. Burton J said he was “wholly unpersuaded” by Addison Lee’s claim that the policy affects the freedom of EU nationals to establish themselves as minicab drivers.

Issue: 7523 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll