header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007 / Jenny Pattison
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Minimising bureaucracy?

Jenny Pattison reviews key changes to health and safety legislation in the construction industry

From April 2007, the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 (the 2007 regulations) will arguably represent the single most important set of regulations covering all construction work in Great Britain. The 2007 regulations revise and bring together the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 1994 (SI 1994/3140) (the 1994 regulations) and the Construction (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1996 (SI 1996/1592) in an attempt to improve health, safety and welfare of construction projects.

The 2007 regulations will apply to all ‘construction work’ and there will only be two types of construction project: notifiable and non-notifiable. A notifiable project will remain one where construction activity will last, or is likely to last, more than 30 days or more than 500 person days on site. The distinction in the 1994 regulations between projects to which the 2007 regulations apply and those which are notifiable has been removed.

Many of the duties placed upon the key players in the project team are already in place

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll