header-logo header-logo

05 July 2023
Issue: 8032 / Categories: Legal News , Charities , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Ministry of Justice announces early advice investment

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has pledged an extra £10.4m for free legal advice charities helping people with housing, family, welfare and debt issues.

The Improving Outcomes Through Legal Support grant, announced this week, will help 59 charities in total.

Clare Carter, chief executive of the Access to Justice Foundation, said the grant would help organisations ‘sustain and improve access to early social welfare and family legal advice, specialist casework and where court or tribunal proceedings are needed’.

Justice minister Lord Bellamy said: ‘Early intervention makes a huge difference in preventing legal problems from snowballing.’

Issue: 8032 / Categories: Legal News , Charities , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll