header-logo header-logo

01 November 2024 / Dr Anil Balan
Categories: Features , Company
printer mail-detail

Minority report: directors' duties & protecting minority shareholders

195043
Balancing the duties of directors & the protection of minority shareholders is a fine line, writes Dr Anil Balan. What protections does the law offer?
  • Sets out the duties of directors to promote the success of the company, and juxtaposes this with the challenges minority shareholders face when majority shareholders or directors make decisions that could disadvantage them.
  • Considers remedies such as derivative actions and unfair prejudice petitions, as well as case law that has clarified their scope and application.
  • Examines the law in other jurisdictions, from which lessons may be learned, and considers the future for protecting minority shareholders’ interests.

The duty of directors to act in the best interests of the company is a cornerstone of UK company law. However, this duty can sometimes conflict with the protection of minority shareholders, whose interests may not always align with those of the company or its majority shareholders. It is important for directors to strike a balance between these competing interests, and for legal and governance mechanisms to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll