header-logo header-logo

01 November 2024 / Dr Anil Balan
Categories: Features , Company
printer mail-detail

Minority report: directors' duties & protecting minority shareholders

195043
Balancing the duties of directors & the protection of minority shareholders is a fine line, writes Dr Anil Balan. What protections does the law offer?
  • Sets out the duties of directors to promote the success of the company, and juxtaposes this with the challenges minority shareholders face when majority shareholders or directors make decisions that could disadvantage them.
  • Considers remedies such as derivative actions and unfair prejudice petitions, as well as case law that has clarified their scope and application.
  • Examines the law in other jurisdictions, from which lessons may be learned, and considers the future for protecting minority shareholders’ interests.

The duty of directors to act in the best interests of the company is a cornerstone of UK company law. However, this duty can sometimes conflict with the protection of minority shareholders, whose interests may not always align with those of the company or its majority shareholders. It is important for directors to strike a balance between these competing interests, and for legal and governance mechanisms to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll