header-logo header-logo

01 November 2024 / Dr Anil Balan
Categories: Features , Company
printer mail-detail

Minority report: directors' duties & protecting minority shareholders

195043
Balancing the duties of directors & the protection of minority shareholders is a fine line, writes Dr Anil Balan. What protections does the law offer?
  • Sets out the duties of directors to promote the success of the company, and juxtaposes this with the challenges minority shareholders face when majority shareholders or directors make decisions that could disadvantage them.
  • Considers remedies such as derivative actions and unfair prejudice petitions, as well as case law that has clarified their scope and application.
  • Examines the law in other jurisdictions, from which lessons may be learned, and considers the future for protecting minority shareholders’ interests.

The duty of directors to act in the best interests of the company is a cornerstone of UK company law. However, this duty can sometimes conflict with the protection of minority shareholders, whose interests may not always align with those of the company or its majority shareholders. It is important for directors to strike a balance between these competing interests, and for legal and governance mechanisms to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll