header-logo header-logo

29 October 2009 / Simon Young
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

The missing piece of the jigsaw

Simon Young turns his attention to complaints in his final article on the impact of the Legal Services Act

Previous articles in this series have looked at the impact of the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) in terms of its overall effect; the idea of legal disciplinary practices, which came into being in April 2009; and the concept of alternative business structures, which are expected to be available from mid-2011. This, the final article in the series, looks at the way the Act deals with the problem of complaints.

The Act creates a new body, known as the Office for Legal Complaints (OLC). It is established by Pts six and seven of, and Sch 15 to, LSA 2007. It is responsible firstly to the other major creature of LSA 2007, the Legal Services Board (LSB), and ultimately to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).

It will take the place of the current Legal Complaints Service (LCS) (part of the Law Society group and so ultimately still controlled by the profession),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll