header-logo header-logo

29 October 2009 / Simon Young
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

The missing piece of the jigsaw

Simon Young turns his attention to complaints in his final article on the impact of the Legal Services Act

Previous articles in this series have looked at the impact of the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) in terms of its overall effect; the idea of legal disciplinary practices, which came into being in April 2009; and the concept of alternative business structures, which are expected to be available from mid-2011. This, the final article in the series, looks at the way the Act deals with the problem of complaints.

The Act creates a new body, known as the Office for Legal Complaints (OLC). It is established by Pts six and seven of, and Sch 15 to, LSA 2007. It is responsible firstly to the other major creature of LSA 2007, the Legal Services Board (LSB), and ultimately to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).

It will take the place of the current Legal Complaints Service (LCS) (part of the Law Society group and so ultimately still controlled by the profession),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll