header-logo header-logo

The missing piece of the jigsaw

29 October 2009 / Simon Young
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Simon Young turns his attention to complaints in his final article on the impact of the Legal Services Act

Previous articles in this series have looked at the impact of the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) in terms of its overall effect; the idea of legal disciplinary practices, which came into being in April 2009; and the concept of alternative business structures, which are expected to be available from mid-2011. This, the final article in the series, looks at the way the Act deals with the problem of complaints.

The Act creates a new body, known as the Office for Legal Complaints (OLC). It is established by Pts six and seven of, and Sch 15 to, LSA 2007. It is responsible firstly to the other major creature of LSA 2007, the Legal Services Board (LSB), and ultimately to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).

It will take the place of the current Legal Complaints Service (LCS) (part of the Law Society group and so ultimately still controlled by the profession),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll